The IOC neither for nor against the call from Play the Game 2011

Photo: Tamas Szafko

15.11.2011

Play the Game has received a friendly, but unclear answer to the proposal of a global code for good governance in sport which ended the Play the Game 2011 conference.

The IOC is neither rejecting nor accepting the call from the 300+ participants at Play the Game 2011 to convene an international conference with a view to preparing a Global Code for Governance in Sport.

In a letter to offices of Play the Game and the rector of the German Sport University Cologne dated 9 November 2011 and sent by email two days later, the IOC’s Director General Christophe de Kepper completely avoids mentioning these key proposals in the 'Cologne Consensus'. 

Instead, the top executive of the IOC in general terms welcomes the initiative, stressing that the subject of good governance in sport “has been of greatest concern to the IOC and has been treated as a priority over the last years, dedicating a lot of efforts to move forward in the right direction”.

Christophe de Kepper also points out the work the IOC has been doing in creating a set of “Basic Universal Principles of Good Governance in Sport” and getting them approved by all international federations and national Olympic committees.

“As we will not be able to call all participants back to Cologne and discuss the answer from the IOC, we can only guess what they think,” says international director of Play the Game, Jens Sejer Andersen. 

“It is a fair shot to say that the participants believe that the matter of corruption and mismanagement in sport is far more urgent than what is expressed by the official IOC answer. Most participants are well aware that IOC has taken some positive steps. Nevertheless the delegates agreed that “existing principles, mechanisms and institutions to enhance good governance and counter corruption have proved inadequate”.

Open for interpretation
On a positive note, Andersen says that the non-answer from the IOC is wide open for interpretation.

“It says yes without saying yes and no without saying no, so we could also take the answer as a silent support for the ideas and aims that Play the Game 2011 proposed. But while it remains a riddle what the IOC really thinks about this, we cannot wait for this riddle to be solved. So we will look for other partners and occasions to strengthen the efforts against corruption in sport,” Andersen says.

One of the next opportunities will be a good governance project that has recently received financial support from the European Commission. Play the Game and seven European partners are set to define a set of guidelines for better governance in sport. 

Within the same stream of EU grants – called “preparatory actions” – the European Olympic Committees and other organisations have also received support for governance-related projects.

“The days are over when Play the Game was almost the only voice crying wolf. It is very encouraging to see that the governance agenda is growing slowly, but steadily. There really is a wolf in the forest, and if sport will not catch it, others will.”


Story on the Cologne Consensus, click here.

  • Kristen ., 20.11.2011 12:27:
     
    Jens, as Sanjay has said - "read between the lines". I could not more agree more, and speaking with fellow colleagues who read your article share the same feelings.

    As we are doing and as Sanjay suggests we should be relentless, there are many players in this and the IOC is one of many of them. A strong signal from the global system needs as we are doing already send them a strong message, we will no longer put up with this, and and that the IOC does not own sport, moreover on several levels as outlined clearly in Cologne, have been a strong contributor we are seeing on several issues hurting the growth and development of the global sports system.

    Christophe de Kepper's response says it all without saying anything. What a way to run a multi-billion organization - If a public corporation, shareholders would certainly not put up with such unethical practices. They would ensure a diagnostic review and answers.

    Onward without the IOC, and will be a wake-up call for them. They need a good shakeup, and recognize their contributions to these issues, moreover the need internally to change their ways, assuring their accountability and practices, that have contributed to these problems over several decades.

    The sports system recognizes their contribution and is forging forward behind the scenes without them.
  • Sanjay Tewari, India, 18.11.2011 12:27:
     
    Dear Jens..let us not read between the lines what IOC says,or tries to say, or does not say..our effort should be relentless, and persistent voices have a tendency to be heard,an if heard, then to necessarily proved an impact
Comment

* required field

*
*
*
What is three plus seven?
*

Guidelines for posting
Play the Game promotes an open debate on sport and sports politics and we strongly encourage everyone to participate in the discussions on playthegame.org. But please follow these simple guidelines when you write a post:

  1. Please be respectful - even if you disagree strongly with certain viewpoints. Slanderous or profane remarks will not be posted.
  2. Please keep to the subject. Spam or solicitations of any kind will not be posted.

Use of cookies

The website www.playthegame.org uses cookies to provide a user-friendly and relevant website. Cookies provide information about how the website is being used or support special functions such as Twitter feeds. 


By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies. You can find out more about our use of cookies and personal data in our privacy policy.