Athlete cleared for Olympic participation – 29 years too late

Photo: Larry Koester/Flickr

The Olympic stadium in Seoul, South Korea. Photo: Larry Koester/Flickr

08.03.2017

By Stine Alvad
Ria Van Landeghem was suspended ahead of the ’88 Seoul Olympics due to results of her doping test. The athlete has contested the result ever since. Now, after almost 30 years, her suspension has been deemed ‘unjustified’.

The past year, the IOC has sent out numerous press releases about the retrospective sanctioning of athletes due to anti-doping violations. We rarely see press releases stating the opposite. On 7 March, however, a press release clearing Belgian long distance runner Ria Van Landeghem of the doping suspicions that led to her suspension ahead of the Seoul Olympics in 1988 was issued by the Belgian Olympic Committee (BOIC). 

Few days before the 1988 Seoul Olympics began, Van Landeghem delivered a pre-competition doping test. The test came out positive for an anabolic steroid, and Van Landeghem had to go home without competing but carrying a two-year ban.

Van Landeghem appealed the decision citing a number of procedural reasons in the testing situation and in the handling of the test results. Within a year, the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) and Appeals Committee of the Flemish Athletics League (VAL) lifted the ban and acquitted the athlete.

For 29 years, the BOIC did not.

Van Landeghem has been trying to clear her name ever since and last year, she submitted reports from three independent doping researches, who all argued that there was no evidence to declare her doping test positive. In a press release sent out this week, the BOIC admits that reanalysis of “the available files and the current state of science” shows that the suspension was ‘unjustified’ and the acquittal ‘well founded’.

“Despite the acquittal (from IAAF and VAL, ed.), the BOIC banned Ria Van Landeghem for two years from the selection lists of the BOIC, despite her place in the top 10 in the world. This suspension should be classified as unjustified given the acquittal by the VAL and the IAAF. The BOIC wishes to apologise for this to Ria Van Landeghem.”

“Based on the analysis results the head of the dopinglab in Seoul should never have declared Ria Van Landeghem positive,” the press release concludes.

Jens Sejer Andersen, international director of Play the Game, congratulates Van Landeghem for her persistence:

“Ria Van Landeghem is not the only one in sport who has had to fight unjust treatment over many years, so the fact that she has persisted and is rewarded, will serve as a valuable reminder both to those who still have not seen the end of their sufferings, and to those who still try to uphold unfair positions.”

More information

 
 

Read the joint press release from Ria Van Landeghem and the BOIC

Read more about Ria Van Landeghem’s case
  • Mark Roberts, England, 09.03.2017 23:39:
     

    Ria a very hard working clean athlete deserves some kind of compensation from the self serving political athletic dictators at that time. Disgraceful, apologies are not enough, what a great example of a strong woman she is. Well done Ria.

Comment

* required field

*
*
*
What is three plus seven?
*

Guidelines for posting
Play the Game promotes an open debate on sport and sports politics and we strongly encourage everyone to participate in the discussions on playthegame.org. But please follow these simple guidelines when you write a post:

  1. Please be respectful - even if you disagree strongly with certain viewpoints. Slanderous or profane remarks will not be posted.
  2. Please keep to the subject. Spam or solicitations of any kind will not be posted.

Use of cookies

The website www.playthegame.org uses cookies to provide a user-friendly and relevant website. Cookies provide information about how the website is being used or support special functions such as Twitter feeds. 


By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies. You can find out more about our use of cookies and personal data in our privacy policy.